Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It really is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life as well as the importance of maintaining law and order in society.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, promoting a more informed and just society.
Whilst there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is not any precedent from the home state, relevant case regulation from another state may very well be regarded as from the court.
“Guaranteeing the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple trustworthy sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to make it correct for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified by the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation includes the names on the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it absolutely was decided, along with the book in which it really is recorded. Different citation requirements may include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Electronic and paper court records retained in the court site might be viewed at the courthouse for free, however there is actually a cost of 10 cents for each page to print from a public access terminal.
Typically, only an appeal accepted through the court of final resort will resolve these types of differences and, For lots of reasons, these appeals are sometimes not granted.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of prospective health risks and hazards.
Hence, it had been held that the right to the healthy environment was part from the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 on the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all such amenities and amenities that a person is entitled to take pleasure in with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to offer an extensive understanding of its implications and practical applications.
one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for more info certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.